Who should decide who sits on North Dakota’s highest courts—the governor or an independent commission? That’s the question behind House Concurrent Resolution 3021, a proposal that would strip the governor of judicial appointment power and reshape the state’s legal system.
Supporters, like Rep. Lori VanWinkle, argue it’s about accountability and citizen recourse, though specifics were scarce. Critics, including the governor’s office and the State Bar Association, warn it’s unnecessary and could undermine judicial independence. The resolution remains in committee, but if it advances, voters will have the final say. Bill details can be found below.
Editor’s Comment: If you want to see what a power grab looks like, this article from Grant Coursey and the Bismarck Tribune on HCR 3021 is a good place to start. Sometimes they come under the guise of “let the people vote on it.”
HCR 3021
A concurrent resolution to amend and reenact sections 3 and 13 of article VI of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the judicial branch and supreme court.
House Sponsors: VanWinkle (R, District 3), Henderson (R, District 15), Hoverson (R, District 3), D. Johnston (R, District 24), Morton (R, District 46), Osowski (R, District 42), Schatz (R, District 39),
Senate Sponsors: Van Oosting (R, District 36),
